“Tottenham Under Scrutiny: Allegations of Transfer Rule Breach Emerge in Jermain Defoe to Portsmouth Deal”

Joe Lee

New evidence, according to The Times, demonstrates that Spurs engaged with an unregistered agency in January 2008 when they agreed to transfer former England striker Defoe to Portsmouth for £7.5 million.

The Football Association is believed to be prepared to investigate the claims, but no action was done at the time.

Club officials have previously faced suspensions, transfer restrictions, and point deductions for breaking FA agent rules.

An FA representative stated, “The case was heard by an independent arbitration panel 15 years ago.”

The FA didn’t participate in the arbitration. There was no disciplinary action done, and it’s unclear how much information was disclosed to the FA at the time. We will consider any fresh information that was not known at the time but indicates there were significant infractions of our policies.

In the 2009–10 season, Tottenham finished three points ahead of Manchester City to qualify for the Champions League, although Luton lost ten points for breaking agent laws in the same year.

After being dismissed by the former striker, who claimed to represent himself in the contract, agent Sky Andrew initially brought up the charges regarding Defoe’s relocation to Fratton Park.

According to The Times, Mitchell Thomas, an unregistered agent and former player for West Ham United and Tottenham, was a key role in the Defoe move, according to the panel during the arbitration hearing. Thomas was included on a list of agents by the Football Association (FA) in 2008 who had been working in the sport without a license.

Additionally, it was revealed that Levy hired licensed agent Stuart Peters to represent Tottenham, although it didn’t seem like he had a representation contract in place, which is needed by FA regulations. Levy consented to pay Peters around £1 million in exchange for his contribution to the £7.5 million transfer.

In a statement, Portsmouth declared that Jermain Defoe was signed in 2008, but Tottenham Hotspur declined to comment. “Those involved in the transfer of the player’s registration from Tottenham Hotspur are no longer at the club, having left many years ago,” the statement reads.

The Pompey Supporters’ Trust and the club presidents, who formally owned the team in 2013, sold it to the present board and ownership in 2017.

“The board and the new executive therefore have no knowledge of any negotiations that led to Portsmouth Football Club’s registration of Jermain Defoe in 2008.”

Matt Lawton, chief sports correspondent for The Times, joined talkSPORT to provide background on the story.

He said: “At that time, Defoe had a representation contract with Sky Andrew. It led to an arbitration because Sky was of the view that Defoe was in breach of his contract, because a footballer cannot use his agent if he basically does a negotiation himself.


“But the view was he’d used a guy called Stuart Peters, a licensed agent, and the assistance also Mitchell Thomas, the ex-Tottenham and West Ham footballer, who was an unlicensed agent.

“So there was a private arbitration and there was some reporting around this at the time but we don’t get to hear these arbitrations, what’s happened, we don’t get to hear the outcome or anything. Actually what we now know is that the outcome of this, Sky won the case and the panel, three QC’s at the time concluded that Mitchell Thomas, an unlicensed agent, had been a central figure in this negotiation.

“He basically helped broker the deal and had been involved in dealing with Tottenham, with Daniel Levy the Tottenham Chairman, had dealt with Harry Redknapp the Portsmouth manager, had dealt on countless occasions on the day of the transfer with Defoe himself. This was all detailed in phone records that had to be acquired through a High Court application and once the panel had these phone records, they then realised that there were potential breaches of FIFA agent rules and FA agent rules.

“These rules are in place to protect the integrity not just of football but of the transfer market, they’re are very serious rules that have to be complied with.”

Lawton added: “There was a further issue raised by the panel that the agent that Tottenham did enlist, there was no evidence in the hearing that there was a formal representation contract in place. You have to have one of those as well, so two potential breaches.

“When Luton Town, in the same year, were found to have paid agents without representation contracts, they received a ten-point deduction. When Massimo Cellino at Leeds was found in 2017 to have dealt with an unlicensed agent, he was banned from football for a year, received a £250,000 fine and the entire Leeds board had to go on an education course on how to deal with football intermediaries. So again, I want to emphasise, these are serious breaches.

“Now, at the end of such an arbitration, the arbitrators send the file to the FA. We don’t believe that the FA did anything about this case. We don’t believe that there were any charges issued, there weren’t any sanctions, no one got punished for this. “The FA have confirmed that no action was taken. They also, based on the statement they’ve given us, they are not clear that they received all the relevant information and now what they’re saying is if the full detail of this case comes to light, which we are revealing in The Times now, then they will review the case.”

Meanwhile, Defoe’s former agent Andrew questions the lack of action from football’s governing bodies.

He told talkSPORT: “Arbitrations need to be taken seriously, it’s supposed to be a serious process where people get evidence and people get to the truth.

“Once that happens, I think that the governing bodies then have to look at it and see if there’s anyone that’s done anything wrong or anything like that because otherwise, what’s the point of an arbitration?

“Defoe was an England footballer, he played in the World Cup that summer, by the time that this award was given in early 2010.

“The whole point of it is to be a court of law, outside the court of law and a confidential process which comes to a conclusion and once it comes to a conclusion, then it has to go to the next phase.

“What Matt tells me is that it did go to the next phase and the governing bodies… well, I can’t say that they haven’t done anything because I don’t know that process, but it does seem that nothing’s happened.”

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *